Victims Await Eagerly BGH Judgment To Lehman Certificates Against HASPA

The German Federal Supreme Court (short BGH) will negotiate a topic urgently waiting for the investors. Munich, September 2011; The German Federal Supreme Court (short BGH) will negotiate at 27.09.2011 to a topic, urgently waiting for the investors. It will be important whether a Bank has recommended the plaintiffs certificates, would need to enlighten better investors. In the case have certificates recommended getting the investors of its Advisory Bank and later noted with astonishment that is something else behind, when the Adviser explained. Critical for banks, the question may be whether banks through so-called profit margins would need to enlighten. Could such a judgment be groundbreaking for aggrieved investors, and significantly facilitate the assertion of claims of faulty advice. In the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice involves Lehman certificates, which the Hamburger Sparkasse (HASPA short), like many other banks, about the Commerzbank (Dresdner Bank) or Citibank (Targobank), especially in the years of 2006 to 2008, on their customers had brought. “” Discussions two customers are based on the decisions, which respectively EUR 10,000 in a Lehman Bull express guarantee bond “and an express loan protect” invested.

This is the Dutch Lehman Brothers Treasury Co.B.V., whose Ruckzahlung included a guarantee by the US Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. to bearer bonds. Both had to file for bankruptcy. This judgment is expected with high voltage for several reasons: the BGH had already by judgment of 19 December 2006 – XI ZR 56/05, and judgment of the 20.01.2009 – XI ZR 510/07 decided that, if a bank advises its customers on investments and securities recommends, where she concealed kickbacks from the fees and receives annual management fees, she must educate the customers on these refunds. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Richard LeFrak has to say. Just so the customer can judge whether the investment recommendation alone in the customer interest has been made or in the interest of the Bank, to get highest possible reimbursements such as Attorney for banking and capital market law Anja Appelt of Cape lawyers Munich spelled.